[QTI] Re: QTI 2.1 draft specification withdrawn

[Felipe Gaúcho]

+1

2009/3/30 Sue Milne <milne.sm at googlemail.com>:
> Hi List,
>
> The withdrawal of the QTI v2.1 draft specification is a cause of great
> concern to those of us engaged in implementing the specification and to the
> many advocates of standards in e-assessment.  QTI v2.1 presents a structure
> which comes close to fulfilling the requirements of the Mathematics and
> Science community, for whom the "fully endorsed" QTI v1.2.1 is seriously
> inadequate.
>
> I find the lack of communication between IMS and the teams that they know
> are implementing the specification frankly astonishing; action as
> fundamental as this should have been preceded by well-publicised warnings
> about their intentions rather than being presented as a fait accompli.
>
> Given that there is active development in progress on implementation, it
> seems contrary of IMS to move the V2 specifications back into the draft
> phase, and I hope they will reconsider their action and reinstate QTI v2.1.
>
> Best regards
> Sue
>
> --
> Dr Sue Milne
>
> Mobile: +44(0)7780995748
>
> Consultant
> ELandWeb Ltd
> Registered Address:
> 54 Grampian Way
> Bearsden
> Glasgow
> G61 4RW
> Company Number: SC312309
>
> _______________________________________________
> IMS-QTI mailing list
> IMS-QTI at lists.ucles.org.uk
> http://lists.ucles.org.uk/lists/listinfo/ims-qti
>
>



-- 

Please help to test this application:
http://fgaucho.dyndns.org:8080/cejug-classifieds-richfaces