[QTI] qti_v2p1_jaxb.jar

[Hamilton, Kenneth]

Thanks for the reply, Steve.  The repository is the one used
by the Aqurate project:

http://code.google.com/p/qtidevelopment/downloads/list

I found it by following a lead from this list.  

Ken

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ims-qti-bounces at lists.ucles.org.uk 
> [mailto:ims-qti-bounces at lists.ucles.org.uk] On Behalf Of Steve Lay
> Sent: Friday, April 11, 2008 11:20 AM
> To: IMS Question & Test Interoperability; QTI Tools
> Subject: Re: [QTI] qti_v2p1_jaxb.jar
> 
> Ken,
> 
> Sorry to be a bit slow getting back - not sure which 
> repository you've 
> been using to get the jar file.  Is it through a Google code project?
> 
> I'm forwarding this reply to another list to see if I can 
> flush out the 
> owners of the files.
> 
> Steve
> 
> Hamilton, Kenneth wrote:
> > Hello.
> > 
> > I have been attempting to develop some code to
> > import QTI code into an existing assessment 
> > system.  In this effort, I have been using
> > the jar qti_v2p1_jaxb.jar, as I understood this
> > to be available for such use under an open 
> > source (BSD) license.  The version that I have
> > been using has class files dated March 10, 2008,
> > and has imsqti_v2p1 as its root package.  It
> > appears to work fine for my needs.
> > 
> > Now I cannot find this version of the jar on 
> > the QTI development site.  It has apparently been
> > replaced with a new jar
> > 
> > qti_v2p1_jaxb_no_mathml_no_xinclude.jar
> > 
> > with a different package structure.  
> > 
> > I would like to continue to use the version I have,
> > and not have to rewrite code.
> > 
> > Typically we get versioned jars via maven, and
> > I have the March 10 version of your jar in our
> > local repository.  It would be preferable to point
> > to a stable reference version that could be 
> > downloaded by maven.
> > 
> > I want to be sure that I am operating within the
> > bounds of your license as I understood it when I
> > copied this jar.  I am planning to use it in an
> > upcoming release of a commercial product, and
> > I accept that it is "without warranty".  
> > 
> > I think it is very important for the adoption of QTI
> > to have reference versions of such fundamental 
> > functionality freely available.  
> > 
> > Please let know if I have misunderstood the terms 
> > of use.  I am operating under a tight schedule and
> > need to know what I can rely upon.
> > 
> > Thank you very much.
> > 
> > Ken Hamilton
> > Principal Software Engineer
> > Follett Digital Resources
> >  
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > IMS-QTI mailing list
> > IMS-QTI at lists.ucles.org.uk
> > http://lists.ucles.org.uk/lists/listinfo/ims-qti
> 
> _______________________________________________
> IMS-QTI mailing list
> IMS-QTI at lists.ucles.org.uk
> http://lists.ucles.org.uk/lists/listinfo/ims-qti
>