[QTI] QTI ver 2.1 or 1.2?

[Niall Barr]

I think it depends on what your aims for the project are. For the next 
year or so, the Common Cartridge is going to keep a basic form of 1.2 
popular, and if the simple item types that the Common Cartridge supports 
satisfy your needs and you want to be able to fully interoperate with 
the big VLEs that might be worth considering. If you want to support 
more interesting item types, or are happy to just to import items from 
other sources use 2.1. The assessment part of 1.2 is fairly broken for 
anything non-trivial, so it doesn't really provide a more pragmatic 
solution than 2.1 for the parts that are missing from 2.0.

I think, in summary, use 2.1 unless you have a very good reason to use 1.2.

Niall

Uma Abhyankar wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> Wanted to know if in our project should we use 2.1
> version or 1.2? We are going to support IMS-QTI
> format.
>
> 2.1 is in draft stage and 2.0 is not fully complete
> version. Hence the question. Please give your esteemed
> advice on the same.
>
> Thanks & Regards
> Uma
>
>
>       Looking for people who are YOUR TYPE? Find them at in.groups.yahoo.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> IMS-QTI mailing list
> IMS-QTI at lists.ucles.org.uk
> http://lists.ucles.org.uk/lists/listinfo/ims-qti
>
>
>