mat_extension

[James Salsman]

Gerrit,

Thank you for your question.

I suggest the wider definition of ANY is the more appropriate. Please 
consider the use of quotation with, e.g., base64 encoding or sub-token 
elements (i.e., <) for allowing that wider definition, including 
even non-well-formed tags.

Non-well-formeed tags may be more freedom than you want, though.

Best wishes,
James

> I want to use the mat_extension-element of the QTI-schema for additonal 
> content. It has "ANY" as content model. 
> I am in doubt about the exact meaning of "ANY" because various XML-tools 
> seem to deal with it in different ways. 
> In XML-spy 5.0 it seems that "ANY" means: anything, both text and 
> (arbitary, but of course well-formed) tags will do. 
> In dot.net applications the same code is not valid. 
> Which tool is right? In other words: does ANY mean: all you can think of 
> (within xml-limits, for example xhtml) or anything you can think of 
> within qti-limits (just text and qti-elments)

Please note that information provided in this forum and the subsequent discussion is the opinion of the author(s) only and do not necessarily represent the views of IMS. 
==^================================================================
This email was sent to: S.W.Lay at ucles-red.cam.ac.uk

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?a2iYTS.a3KpDX.Uy5XLkxh
Or send an email to: IMSQTI-unsubscribe at topica.com

TOPICA - Start your own email discussion group. FREE!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/create/index2.html
==^================================================================